Showing posts with label Baptism of Jesus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Baptism of Jesus. Show all posts

Thursday, March 9, 2017

Wilderness Testing Matthew 4:1-11



We’ve been telling this story about Jesus in the wilderness for roughly two thousand years. Yet, in the last ten to twenty years, scholars have been looking at this story anew. They have concluded that as God’s word continues to be a living thing among God’s people, as it continues to draw us into thinking about God’s words in today’s context, and as we continue to diligently unpack the original language and sharpen our translating skills, fresh and maybe even better ways of telling the story of Jesus’ time in the wilderness emerge. It is not that we have been wrong, but that there are nuances in this story that are waiting to be highlighted that help us appreciate this testing ground story more fully.


One of our recent observations is that when we preach this story, as preachers we need to make the stronger connection of this story to the baptism of Jesus and disconnect it from the Mountain of Transfiguration. As the season of Epiphany started with Jesus’ baptism, so now Lent begins with the end of that baptism story.


For many years we have been so preoccupied with the forty days and the forty nights in the wilderness and connecting the symbolism of the forty days to the forty days of Lent, to the forty days and nights of Moses on Mount Sinai and the giving of the Ten Commandments, to the forty days and forty nights of Noah’s flood time and the restoration of the world through him and his family, to the Israelites’ forty years in the wilderness after leaving Egypt, that we have forgotten that this story is part of the greater account of Jesus’ baptism.


In our preaching, the Church has forgotten to strengthen the understanding that God, with the Holy Spirit, does not send people out into wilderness time to create believers, but that God, with the Holy Spirit, sends us out into the wilderness because we are believers. God sends Jesus into the wilderness with the confidence of a Father who knows his son is equipped to engage the wilderness.


So it is that we witness Jesus coming up out of the waters of baptism and the Spirit coming down from heaven and alighting on him. With Jesus, we hear God’s words, “This is my beloved son with whom I am well pleased,” and then we witness the Holy Spirit leading Jesus into the wilderness. This is not a time to discover if Jesus is the Son of God, but a time of witnessing who Jesus is as the Son of God.


Recent scholars who have noticed this shift in translating the story prefer to record this dialogue between the devil and Jesus in statements rather than questions. The devil is not confused about who Jesus is, and so he says, “Since you are the son of God, do this or that. Since you are the son of God, then you were there when the world was spoken into existence, so speak these stones into bread.”


It is like those questions we ask when we are children. Since God is all powerful, can God create a stone that is greater than what God can lift? Or, since angels have no substance, how many can stand on the head of a pin? Since Jesus rose from the dead, why isn’t our world better than it is? Since Jesus has the power to heal, why doesn’t he heal everybody?”


So, I bring this question to you today. What is the difference between testing and tempting? I ask this question because I believe this story is more about testing than it is about tempting. It is more about standing up for who we are than discovering who we are. It is more about determining what authority is rather than discovering whether Jesus has authority. This authority is more complicated than performing a few magic acts like speaking stones into bread or jumping over tall buildings in a single bound and has much more to do with bowing down before the powers that defy God in the world. It is much more about not being distracted and seduced by the splendor of power but living in a right relationship with God.


We probably all know the proverb, “If you give a hungry person a fish, you feed that person for a day, but if you teach hungry people to fish, you can feed them for a lifetime.” The challenge we witness today is, “Since you are the Son of God, solve the problem of world hunger. Speak these stones into bread.” But the real issue is not only about whether people are being fed, it is whether people know how to be fed and how to feed themselves.


Our challenge today is not about whether the Son of God can throw himself from the pinnacle and not be destroyed, but it is about our faith in God which does not depend on spectacular magic acts of entertainment for belief; an understanding that God’s power in our midst goes beyond the spectacular to the strength of a saving, grace-filled relationship with us. It is not about the glory and the splendor of the kingdoms and the power and authority that we might have within them, but it is all about God’s grace, that is God’s undeserved love, and our ability to live with one another. It is not always pretty; it is not the Hollywood romance; rather, it is part of what happens in our everyday lives, in the kind word, the loving touch, or the blessings we give and receive.


There is a difference here between test and temptation. In the middle of a test we are sometimes tempted to take short cuts, to make quick fixes without considering the systemic problems causing the need in the first place. A few years ago, Dr.  Craig Nessan wrote a book called, “Give Us This Day.” In it he shows that the problem with world hunger is not that we don’t have enough food in the world to feed all the people of the world; the problem is being able to distribute the food we have to the people who need it. He discusses what some of the problems we have in organizing that distribution. The problems seem so big that one is daunted in even considering whether or not to try to overcome the problem. Yet, in part, because of Dr. Nessan’s book and a deep concern and commitment from our Lutheran brothers and sisters, through organizations like Lutheran World Relief and the Lutheran World Hunger Appeal, in part because of you supporting our synod and our churchwide organization, and your faithful presence in the world, policies are being changed, work is being done, and we are finding ways of getting that indispensable food from one place to another.


I know I told you the story last year, but I am going to tell you again. While working with some young people studying this passage, I asked them why it was important for Jesus to not change the stones into bread. Those young people argued about it for a while, and then one of the young women said, “It’s sort of like when my parents have a dinner party. When the people first arrive, they may stand around and talk with a drink, and they may take some food from the hors d’oeuvre table, but no one takes plates and plates of food then.”


When I asked her how that helped us understand Jesus changing stones into bread, she said, “They don’t take a lot of food then because they know that the dinner is coming.”


When I pushed her on that she looked at me and said, “Well, duh! Jesus didn’t come to be an hors d’oeuvre for us, he came to be the whole meal.”


In the systems of how we live with one another, at the systemic level of what we need to live, there is more than food. So Jesus says, “One does not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.” In order to live healthy lives, in healthy relationships, we need bread and God’s words of forgiveness, God’s assurance of grace, that is God’s undeserved love. We need the whole body of Christ, not just an hors d’oeuvre, to walk in the knowledge of God’s presence with us each and every day.


The Gospel story is an account of that assurance. It tells us that Jesus is the Son of God; even the devil recognizes this. The test is to see whether Jesus will go for the quick fix, immediate gratification, or whether Christ’s authority includes a longer plan that will address the systematic problems of our world.


So we begin our Lenten season this year, remembering that we too are being tested (not to discover whether we believe, but because we do believe) because together we are the Body of Christ. I know that you have heard the test come in various words, but the test is often worded something like this. “Since you are the body of Christ in the world, solve the world problems. Make all of the relationships of the world beautiful and pleasing. Make peace happen.”


If we just work at the surface level without considering the systemic problems like racism, classism, sexism, and ableism, we don’t get to the core of the problem. The symptoms may go away for a while, but the problems will continue to arise. It would be so nice if we could just pray everything away, but our life involvement in Christ is required. We, with Christ, must stand against the forces that draw us away from God and stand up for who and whose we are.


In this Lenten season, we will continue to walk together with the assurance of Christ’s presence. We will journey to the cross, and we will explore the many relationships we have in Christ’s resurrection world. We will be with Nicodemus in the night. We will be with the Syrophoenician woman at the well. We will be with the blind man who receives sight, and we will witness Lazarus rising from the dead. Each of these meetings have complicated systemic problems that are raised for us to consider as we live into God’s word and God’s world with God’s people. May you know God’s blessings in this Lenten time.

Wednesday, March 8, 2017

A LONG AND WINDING ROAD


THE ANGELUS TRUMPET           

The Unexpurgated Source for Alternative Bible Facts  


A LONG AND WINDING ROAD

Dateline: Deadwood SD, March 5, 04:01:11

by Matt Hughes


Today Biblical Archeology Digest (BAD) archeologist O. Toby Norske was again in the news when he revealed the most recent set of runic records found near Jordan Creek, in Harmony, Minnesota. According to these records, Jesus left a life in Harmony and traveled into the western wilderness.  He may have been the first to follow the advice, “Go West, young man.”

Norske’s work is important because it moves research from the Jordan Creek area in southern Minnesota into the greater North American setting. Norske said, “We started looking for places where Jesus might have gone, based on Biblical accounts of course, and other ancient sources. New findings in the ghost town, Deadwood, SD, suggest that the wilderness west journey could have ended there. At an average 15.7 miles per day (a very reasonable walk in those days), Jesus could have ended his forty-day journey in the wilderness crossing most of Minnesota and South Dakota.”

Ayne Shent (St. Olive, ‘02), one of BAD’s Norwegian antiquity scholars, helped with the research and was present when some preliminary diggings were initiated. The whole team was shocked when they found a stone with identical markings as the Jordan Creek find. This tends to confirm Norske’s hypothesis.

The writings on this stone purport that Jesus traveled into the western wilderness and was tested. Jesus rejected spells as ways to solve the world hunger issue, but Shent notes that this part of the nation has been known as the “great bread basket” for many years.

The stone further claims that Jesus was taken to the pinnacle of what we now know as the Corn Palace where he refused to leap without an appropriate bungee harness and line. Lastly, he was taken to the highest point in the Black Hills, where he surveyed the wonders of the western lands, and he again declared them good.

After the mountain-top experience, Jesus found himself where angels ministered to him. Norske now believes that the end of the testing time concluded in Cactus Flat (a popular stop today to visit a prairie dog village) because, he explains, “From the rune stone, we now understand that the word we usually think of as ‘angels’ really means ‘prairie dogs’. This would suggest that Jesus was transubstantiated or teleported in some way from place to place. Otherwise, he wandered all the way to the Black Hills and then returned part way, and then proceeded to Deadwood, another five- or six-day journey by foot.“

The terminal location of Deadwood is suggested by the cross event itself. The dead wood is the signature name of the cross and has been made famous because of it. Norske said, “What comes out of these new writings is how maniacally focused the inquisitor is and how casual Jesus is in the midst of it.”

As scholars continue to process this new information, Shent shared that some wonder whether this narrative suggests a first uprising of aboriginal first-nation people against the misunderstood intentions of an early Viking expedition or whether the leadership of that fated expedition was in fact Jesus and that he was a Viking rejected by an unknown adversary.

Maybe Jesus is Norwegian after all.

Sunday, January 8, 2017

Show-and-Tell, Matthew 3:13-17

Today is the first Sunday in Epiphany. The word “Epiphany” comes from two Greek words, epi, which means “on,” or “to,” and phainein, “to show.” The Day of Epiphany was Friday, and the reading for the day is always the story of the wise men honoring Jesus as the king of our lives and giving him gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh. This is the season of God-made-known, expressed in unexpected ways and places that bring hope and new life in defiance of death.

It is what I like to call the ultimate show-and-tell time, well maybe the penultimate or second best show-and-tell next to Easter. It is bigger than Christmas Eve, in a sense, because the shepherds are, after all, just shepherds, and while they tell the Jewish people of all that they had seen and heard, the wise men represent the gentile world coming to honor or worship Jesus as king, or Lord of all.

 In this show-and-tell season, we will also see Jesus being baptized. We will hear him preach to the people on the mountain, and from a mountain we will witness Jesus talking with Elijah and Moses. But before we enter too far into this joyous season, let us take some time to review what has been happening in Matthew’s Gospel. We have read some of the things in worship since Advent began, some things are generally known to us, and maybe some things are not often thought about.

Thus far, in the book of Matthew, we have been presented with the great genealogy of God’s chosen people that begins with Abraham and ends with Joseph. We have heard how Joseph, guided by dreams, chooses to take Mary for his wife because of God’s work through the Holy Spirit. We know the story of the wise men who saw a star appear in the heavens at the time of Jesus’ birth; and after traveling for some time (as much as two years), they ask King Herod about the newborn king (supposing they will find a king among kings). We know also that the wise men, finding Jesus at home in Bethlehem, recognize him as king and give him royal gifts. We know that the wise men, directed by an angel, journeyed home by a different route to avoid King Herod’s wrath. We know of King Herod’s rage and his slaughter of all the children in Bethlehem two years old and under.

In the midst of the comings and goings of these different groups of people, in the midst of political intrigue, in the midst of joys and sorrow, Joseph, led by dreams, moves his family, first to Egypt and then to Nazareth, in Galilee, where Jesus grows up. At the same time, another person is living among God’s people who discerns God’s activity in the currents of time and history. His name is John, and he is actively working to prepare God’s people for receiving and recognizing God’s presence through repentance and cleansing in baptism.

That brings us to today’s gospel. John is proclaiming that the Kingdom of God has drawn near and that God’s people need to rethink their relationship with God. He is baptizing (cleansing, or anointing with water) those who are able to embrace this new way of thinking, those who are committed to changing the way they live in relationship with God, when the cause for that change, Jesus, appears before him. What a show-and-tell moment!

We are not surprised to see a subject of the king submit to the authority of the king. Therefore, we are not surprised that John might think that he should be baptized by Jesus. And, knowing Jesus to be sinless himself, we are puzzled by Jesus presenting himself to be baptized. Why should Jesus need this baptism of repentance? Confused, with John, we wonder in greater scope, not just whether John should be baptized by Jesus but whether the whole world shouldn’t be crowding in to be baptized by Jesus.

Then, with the first words Jesus speaks in this Gospel, Jesus tells John and us something that will direct much of the conversation that we will be having throughout the rest of Matthew’s account of Jesus’ teaching, trial, death, and resurrection life. Jesus’ first words in this gospel are: “Let it be so now, for it is proper for us in this way to fulfill all righteousness.”

This statement seems so mundane. In fact, for all my life I have generally passed over these words thinking that they were divine theo-speak or God-talk for “I know, I know, but this is what is expected of me, so let’s get it over with.”

Indeed, until this year, I have always jumped past them to the big words and drama—the heavens opening, the dove descending, those stentorian words, “This is my son, the beloved, with whom I am well pleased.” It seems so natural to go to God’s great endorsement of Jesus. “This is my son.” After that, it’s like “Well, there you have it. God said it; I believe it. What more is there to say? Go home knowing that God has spoken. Thanks be to God.”

But God’s words are only the final stamp of approval. They follow at the end of a long series of revelations. That is why there is a genealogy, Joseph’s acceptance of the angel’s words, the new star that shines in the heavens, the witness of the Wise Men, even the rage of Herod, and the exodus of the Holy Family to Egypt and back again. All of this speaks to Jesus being the one who saves, our Emmanuel, God revealed to us as human among humans.

Although this dramatic event is recalled in all the Gospels, Jesus’ words, “Let it be so now, for it is proper for us in this way to fulfill all righteousness”, are recorded only in Matthew, and somehow, they get passed over, even ignored. Matthew must think that they are important because it would be so easy to leave them out.

So what does “all righteousness” mean. Back in Advent, we talked about righteousness because Joseph was a righteous man. We talked about righteousness as being living by the law and doing God’s justice. Today we discover that there might even be more. What might it mean to fulfill all righteousness? Elizabeth Achtemeier writes, “’Righteousness,’ throughout the Bible, is the fulfillment of the demands of a relationship.” So, fulfilling all righteousness has something to do with living into the demands and expectations required of the relationship we have with God.

If it is expected that all people should be baptized, then Jesus, Emmanuel, God with us as being, truly human, must also be baptized. But is it necessary? Douglas John Hall, in his book, God and Human Suffering writes, “Though sinless himself, Christ suffers the consequences of sin, i.e., he suffers temptation, alienation, anxiety, and limitation.” As such, Jesus’ baptism models a new relationship for dealing with both the dying to the causes of sin and a sustaining relationship transcending the consequences of sin. This new relationship includes forgiveness, grace, mercy, presence, peace and wholeness, and eternal life.

At Bible camp one year, I was the counselor for a group of boys who ranged from eight to thirteen years old. Many of them were openly challenging the rules of safety established by the camp. I had determined that violators of the law would suffer the punishment of having to clean the bathroom beyond their usual daily cleaning responsibilities. As an incentive, I told them that if they were good, I would clean the bathroom.

Each day, one group or another of my boys managed to get in trouble. By the end of the week all of the boys had had an opportunity to learn the skills of cleaning the bathroom except two eight-year-old boys who were particularly compliant in all things.

The night before we were to go home, these two boys came to me. They looked embarrassed. They had difficulty looking at me. They were shuffling their feet and mumbling a lot. Finally, I asked them if there was a problem? One boy finally looked at me and asked, “How bad do we have to be in order to clean the bathroom tomorrow?” I told them that questioning my judgment about punishments was enough.

The next day, these two boys started cleaning the bathroom. The others came and asked what those two had done to deserve it? When the two boys refused to answer, the older boys began to think that those two had really done something wrong. And then, one by one, the older boys said something like, “Let me help you with that.” Before I knew it, all fourteen boys were in there cleaning, scrubbing and sweeping the bathroom. My two eight-year-olds were grinning from ear-to-ear. Somehow, the demands of the relationship of belonging included cleaning the bathroom, and they had made the grade. That time, fulfilling all righteousness included cleaning the bathroom.

I was proud of my boys that week at camp. They had found a way to value each other without exception. Jesus’ statement claims that fulfilling all righteousness includes baptism and models a new way of living together in relationship with one another. I can’t help but think that God’s endorsement of Jesus’ work at the beginning of Jesus’ ministry is no less proud.

In the coming weeks, we will witness Jesus fully entering into our world where he will suffer all of the consequences of sin, but he will also show-and-tell new ways of being in relationship with one another. He will preach new ways of thinking about the law. He will teach new ways of thinking about giving value to all of God’s creation and the people in it. He will model new healing ways of wholeness that will challenge the way we live. In all of this, Jesus will challenge the way we think about death and our eternal relationship with God.

So, let us begin our time of learning the new demand of this new relationship we have with God and one another. Let us stand before the world in this show-and-tell time of Epiphany to claim God’s word revealed to us in the person of Jesus Christ. “Let us do so now, for it is proper, in this way, to fulfill all righteousness.” And fulfilling all righteousness, let the mercy, redemption, and liberation of God’s rule cover the world as Christ’s baptismal waters have covered us.

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

Minnesota Finds Jesus


THE ANGELUS TRUMPET            INTERNATIONAL NEWS 


MINNESOTA FINDS JESUS!!!

Dateline: Jordan Creek, Holy Land?, January 8, 03:13:17

Matt Hughes



Among many in the Ole Land, it has long been believed that Jesus was Norwegian, but, until recently, little evidence has been found for that. Now breaking archeological news from BAD (Biblical Archaeology Digest) reveals that Jesus may have very well been Norwegian. That is still inconclusive, but more importantly, Jesus IS from Minnesota.


According to the BAD archeologist heading up this recent dig, O. Toby Norske, the before unknown collection of rune stones found in Fillmore county, Minnesota, indicates that the baptism of our Lord occurred on the North American continent. The team was first intrigued by the solar alignment of the stones. The first comparison of the writing was to aboriginal first nation petroglyphs. Norske said nothing came of that.

Although not a member of the dig team, Ayne Shent (St. Olive, ‘02), one of BAD’s Norwegian antiquity scholars, looked at the stones and suggested that they could be ancient runes. Templates of other runic writings were calibrated to the exact size of the writings on the stones and then properly oriented to accommodate lithographic shifting. Norske enthusiastically said, “Hoorah! We were able to read the message of divine providence that was left for us.”

In an aside, Norske confessed, “You know, some people still think they are just a bunch of rocks with random scratches on them” before he explained that this runic find corrects several scribal errors in the Greek editions of the New Testament. The letter to Philemon should more accurately be read the letter to Fillmore. Instead of Galilean, the runes show gal-o-Lena. Norske interprets this to mean that Mary’s mother’s name was not Anna or Hannah as previously thought. He explained, “Now we can more fully understand that Jesus went to gal of Lena who is Mary. This really helps us understand the humanity of Jesus as he was growing up. How natural it is for a young boy to go to his mother in times of trouble as Paul wrote concerning Jesus’ early life:

‘whenifindmyselfintimesoftroublemotherMarycomestomespeakingwordsofwisdomLetitbeandinmyhourofdarknesssheisstandingrightinfrontofmespeakingwordsofwisdomLetitbeiwakeuptothesoundofmusicmotherMarycomestomespeakingwordsofwisdomLetitbe’”.

Norske believes this passage demonstrates the prime paradigm of the Biblical mother-son relationship and facilitates our understanding of that daily “mother and child reunion that is only a moment away”. He further declared, “It also leads to a greater understanding of Jesus’ willingness to die for us—“’Let it be’.”

When asked how interest got started in this project, Norske responded, “All of this got started because of the account of Jesus’ baptism. Some textual variants suggested that the baptism wasn’t at the Jordan River, but the Jordan Creek. And you can tell from the story that John and Jesus are very close and respect one another. They are just so darn polite, just like Minnesotans. You can almost hear their conversation that day. ‘I should be baptized by you.’”

“’No, I should be baptized by you.’”

“’No, I should be baptized by you.’”

“’No, I should be baptized by you.’”

“’No, I should be baptized by you.’”

“’No, I should be baptized by you.’”

“And after that issue is resolved, you can just see them, on that clear January day, standing on the banks of Jordan Creek saying, ‘After you, cousin.’”

“’No, after you.’”

“’No, after you.’”

“’No, after you.’”

“’No, after you.’”

“’No, after you.’”

“’No, after you.’”

 “I mean, it just warms your heart to think of them going out there with their ice axes and saws to prepare a place for the baptism. You can tell how refreshing it was too. The shout they must have made opened the heavens and scared a local pigeon right out of the sky.”

Norske admitted many of the textual variants are slight. He indicated the clearest textual difference found among the stones is God’s approving words of Jesus. It appears that the rune account says, “Ja, hey der. Lookin’ pretty good der, lille buddy!”

When asked about what she thought of the importance of the find, Norma L. Prankstor said, “This find helps us understand the old story concerning the lack of Minnesotans in heaven.” She was referring to a local legend concerning the first Minnesotans at the pearly gates. It is believed that one of them held open the gate for those who were coming after, waving them through and everyone was stepping aside saying, “No, after you.” Prankstor added, “It [the story] means so much more to me now. It really makes you think, y’know?”

A new BAD site dig in nearby St. Peter hopes to discover whether St. Lucy might be a Minnesotan too. Gustolphus Adavus enthusiasts are hopeful.